A philosophical argumentative essay
A philosophical argumentative essay
A philosophical argumentative essay involves a reasoned defense of some claim by scholars, individual or a group of people. It must, therefore, offer an argument and it can’t consist of the mere report of your opinions, nor in the mere report of the opinions of the scholars and philosophers, and instead defend the claims you make and offer valid reasons to believe them. The question of whether God exists or not is a major concern to most people worldwide. It is agreed on by different communities on a different basis, and therefore every prevailing mind of humankind will choose opinions based on their culture and origin.
In the ancient times, most people believed in the existence of many gods, of course apart from the Jews who believed in the existence of only one God. Obeying the first commandment was a bit difficult because the Jews had believed that Baal, Moloch, and Dagon were real gods but otherwise wicked since they collaborated with their enemies, therefore, the transition in the belief that these gods were wicked to the fact that they dint exist was impossible and very difficult to believe. Monotheism, which at the beginning of Antiochan persecution had been creed one part of the small nation, was adopted by Christianity and later Islam. It did not, however, succeed from the Hinduism part because they had very many gods; Buddhism had none since they were relatively primitive, the Hinduism had many gods instead (MacIntyre 31).
Christians are now faced with the problem of atheism, and the worst part being they aren’t certain about the whole idea and no one can provide a conclusive argument on the side of theism. I think it’s high time we abandoned this political and geographical nature of categorizing religion of people, which has occasionally been rejected by educated people ever since the time of the ancient Greeks. They were not contented by the religious beliefs of their neighbors but however focused more to consider what the reason and philosophy had to say about that particular issue.
I will not attempt to set forth in the argument about the existence of God. However, I still believe I one theory, which however still holds water, even amongst the many philosophers, is the existence of the first ever cause, from which the entire whole series starts. Some Hindu think suffers the defects of an argument, because he once said that the universe rests upon an elephant when asked what the elephant rested upon, he said it rested upon a tortoise; the argument, however, continued, because scholars now wanted to know what the tortoise rested upon (Beiser 65). On questioning, his words were then quoted, ‘I am tired of this, suppose we change the topic.’ This clearly shows his uncertainty and illustrates the unsatisfactory character of the First-Cause argument (Beiser 101).
Basing on some modern treatises on physics, which show that some physical processes traced back in time, illustrate that there must have been some magical beginning and accept that it was due to divine creation. They, however, avoid the fact that this type of theory and reasoning might carry some intelligible facts. The arguments and reasoning for the existence of a Supreme Being, however, are rejected by a wide group of the theologians, which according to me has completely lacked a satisfactory reasoning. The reasoning of the scholars had lots of sense and if it had been heeded upon, they would have demonstrated the truth of their reasoning.
The world was once bare less and lifeless. During evolution, it developed into plants, animals, and human beings, in the very course of evolution. However, the theologians hope that the future will produce more men like them and less of the less favored groups. There is every reason to believe and hope that life on our planet will not continue forever so that any optimism based upon the course of terrestrial history must be temporary and limited in its preview.
I am not certain, however, what other people’s beliefs and opinions are, but you must concede that a good percentage of the many known ideas, facts, and theories of the human kind about the existence of God are purely irrational. The facts that people base on their different arguments do not hold waters completely. I cannot still doubt theories that have been held to be very true in a long time, especially when this belief has only prevailed and existed in particular geographical parts of the world, just as it is a problem with theological concerns (Thurow 77). It is customary to believe that if a belief or theory is entrusted by many people, then it must be true or rather there must be something reasonable about it and this view cannot be held by someone who studied history professionally (Thurow 78).
